Status in the case file. A Ukrainian court acquitted Golubov on the grounds that his involvement had not been proven.
About the editorial tag. ‘Suspect’ is the editorial label used for this series. Procedural status and case outcomes are indicated separately.
Relevance to the topic. CarderPlanet: the prosecution’s case and the defence’s argument.
How ‘Script’ came to feature in the investigation files
For US investigators, Script was a key figure in the Russian-speaking carding scene of the early 2000s. WIRED, citing US Postal Inspector Greg Crabb, describes how the Postal Inspection Service, the FBI and the Secret Service worked on the Dmitry Golubov case. Ukrainian law enforcement officers arrested him in Odessa in the summer of 2005. This confirms international involvement in the investigation, but the question of the identity of the user ‘Script’ and his actions was later examined in a Ukrainian court. [1] [2]
The Kyiv prosecution
According to case materials examined by ‘CHESNO’ and ‘Ukrainska Pravda’, the prosecution considered Golubov to be the user of the pseudonyms Weber and Script and linked him to a Kyiv-based group under investigation in connection with bank card fraud. Investigators relied on witness statements, materials from US agencies and correspondence. Golubov denied any involvement. He claimed that the link between his name and the account arose after a copy of his lost passport appeared online. [3]
Why did the court acquit Golubov?
The Solomensky District Court of Kyiv acquitted Golubov on the grounds that his involvement had not been proven. Some witnesses recognised him based on information from the internet and third-party materials. The court identified contradictions in other testimonies. According to ‘CHESNO’, the prosecution failed to specify when, where and how Golubov committed the alleged offences. The court deemed the US evidence presented to be too general to be linked to specific instances of card forgery. [3]
Politics and documentary boundaries
Golubov’s public profile extended far beyond the scope of the criminal investigation. By the time of the ‘CHESNO’ publication in 2018, he was a Member of Parliament, whilst WIRED had written about his political project as early as 2008. Both dates are significant for the CarderPlanet story. In 2005, the investigation regarded Golubov as a key figure, whilst the Ukrainian court’s verdict on this charge was an acquittal. The US conviction of Roman Vega and the Ukrainian case against Golubov have their own bodies of evidence and different outcomes. [3] [4] [5]
How did the investigation obtain the correspondence?
According to ‘CHESNO’, one line of inquiry centred on Roman Vega’s seized computer. The case files contained correspondence with the account ‘Script’. The correspondence may have indicated a link between forum participants; however, during the trial, the question remained as to how reliably specific actions of the account could be linked to Golubov. Citing documents from US agencies, the Ukrainian investigators failed to present the court with sufficient evidence to support such a conclusion regarding the alleged offences. [3] [1]
If you have any documents or further details regarding this case, Please write to the editor.
