Kirill Pakhomov is an entrepreneur whom the Ukrainian electronics supplier Monolit presents as its Chief Executive Officer. Pakhomov’s name appears in reports on an investigation by Ukraine’s Economic Security Bureau (BEB) into the import and sale of equipment. In publicly available copies of two appeal rulings relating to these proceedings, the names of those involved have been redacted. ‘Telegraf’ and 368.media report on Pakhomov’s connection to the incidents described therein. [1] [3] [4] [5] [8]
Pakhomov, Monolit and ‘Flymultitech’
Monolit describes its work as supplying electronics to businesses and providing procurement support. On the company’s website, the CEO’s name is written in the Ukrainian spelling — Kirilo Pakhomov. According to *Telegraf*, he is originally from Sloviansk and registered as a sole trader (FLP) in 2021. The main business activity cited by the publication relates to data processing and the publication of information on websites. *Telegraf* also reports that on his LinkedIn profile, Pakhomov describes himself as the owner of Monolit. [1] [5]
In a public statement regarding imports, Pakhomov mentioned Monolit and Flymultitech LLC (Ukrainian: ТОВ ‘ФЛАЙМУЛЬТИТЕХ’, EGRPOU code 45834804). According to data from the Ukrainian Unified State Register, published by Opendatabot, the limited liability company was registered on 28 May 2025. The register entry lists Yevhen Kozlov as the director, sole shareholder and ultimate beneficial owner. The first transactions described by the investigation date back to 2022. To identify the importer in each instance, it is essential to examine the customs declarations for specific consignments and the payment documents relating to suppliers. [2] [4] [5]
The BEB case and the two orders to seize assets
Case No. 72025001110000049 was registered on 23 October 2025. The published rulings list three areas of investigation: the possible import of goods in circumvention of customs controls, money laundering and tax evasion. According to the BEB’s account, the goods in question included Apple phones and accessories, quadcopters, chargers and other electronic devices. The investigation points to sales via the Monolit website and Telegram, and mentions cash, bank transfers and USDT among the payment methods. [3] [4]
In a ruling dated 12 August 2026, the Kyiv Court of Appeal upheld the seizure of property confiscated during a search of non-residential premises in Lviv. On 23 September, the same court upheld the seizure of property relating to a separate search in Kyiv. In both cases, appeals lodged by representatives of the property owners were considered. The court assessed the grounds for retaining the seized items and documents as part of the pre-trial investigation. On 11 November, the publication 368.media also reported on the seizure of documents, bank cards and electronic devices in connection with one of the Kyiv incidents. [3] [4] [8]
Where did the 26.85 million USDT and 78.5 million UAH come from?
The September ruling sets out the investigation’s calculations regarding deposits into a TRON network wallet from 5 March 2022 to 14 February 2026. The total amount is stated as 26,850,244.64 USDT, or approximately 1.067 billion UAH according to the investigation’s estimates. This works out at approximately 599.1 million UAH for 2025. It is possible to determine which specific transfers related to the payment for particular goods by cross-referencing transactions, orders and source documents. [4] [6]
Around 78.5 million UAH — the estimate of potential non-payment of personal income tax and the military levy, as set out in the court document. In total, approximately 72.5 million UAH relates to income tax and approximately 6 million UAH to the military levy. These figures are cited in the presentation of the investigation’s position in the dispute over the seizure of assets. [4] [5]
What Pakhomov said
According to a report by *Telegraf*, Pakhomov has publicly stated that Monolit and *Flymultitech* comply with Ukrainian legislation when importing goods, clear goods through customs and fulfil their tax obligations. An article in *Fakty* on supplies to the Defence Forces cites figures showing that the limited liability company imported goods worth over 200 million hryvnias and paid 54.99 million hryvnias in VAT and customs duties. The amounts publicly cited relate to payments made by the limited liability company upon the import of goods. The investigation’s findings separately assess personal income tax and the military levy. [4] [5] [7]
In a report dated 15 October, Fraza stated that, at that time, the investigating authorities had not publicly announced that charges had been brought against any specific individuals in this case. The materials found as of 11 November contain no confirmation that Pakhomov had been served with a notice of suspicion or that a verdict had been handed down in these proceedings. [8] [9]
Related topics
The KARTEL KHIMPROM publication analyses data on imports, USDT inflows and public statements made by the company. Kirill Pakhomov and Monolit: electronics imports, 26.85 million USDT and the BEB case.
