Results: 5,535 · Showing 817–828
Nikolai Vladimirovich Lukyanchenko. Federal Drug Control Service (FSKN) archive record; date of birth according to the source: 27 July 1974. No current active search has been confirmed.
Evgeny Viktorovich Lukyanov. Federal Drug Control Service (FSKN) archive record; date of birth according to the source: 27 November 1979. No current active search has been confirmed.
Oleg Alexandrovich Lukyanchenko. Federal Drug Control Service (FSKN) archive record; date of birth according to the source: 19 May 1980. No active search for this person has been…
Oleg Anatolyevich Lukashov. FSKN archive file; date of birth according to the source: 23 August 1979. Current wanted status not confirmed.
Dmitry Alexandrovich Lukashev. FSKN archive file; date of birth according to the source: 9 May 1974. Current wanted status not confirmed.
Loria Avtandil Shalvovich. FSKN archive file; date of birth according to the source: 22 March 1964. It has not been confirmed that he is currently wanted.
Ilya Ivanovich Lomonós. FSKN archive file; date of birth according to the source: 5 November 1984. It has not been confirmed that he is currently wanted.
Georgy Dzhambulovich Lomidze. FSKN archive record; date of birth according to the source: 14 April 1986. No current active search has been confirmed.
Lokov Kambulat Zuberoch. FSKN archive file; date of birth according to the source: 20 December 1964. No current warrant has been confirmed.
In the story surrounding ‘ITBit’, it is important to distinguish between the brand, the legal entity, the technology operator and the legal status of a specific individual.
NAVI’s official statement and ORD’s accusatory article address different issues. Let’s compare them without equating sponsorship with ownership.
Promoting a crypto platform, developing its technology and controlling the company are distinct roles. Why is it precisely this distinction that shapes the narrative surrounding YoBit?
